Personally I particularly like the attitude on page 5 on feedback from RP supporters to an article about RP... an 'Introduction to Logic'
1. If it is Thursday, then I have to go to work.
2. It is not Thursday.
3. Therefore I do not have to go to work.
Here is a breakdown of the article. And another.
Some comments on the article:
Well, finally an article in the national media about Dr. Ron Paul. No or little mention of his life. Doctor, veteran, 10 term U.S. Congressman, married 51 years to the same woman, No mention of the endorsements made from those in economics and academia. Hardly any mention of the culture that has sprung up around the American message of freedom which originates from the American constitution. Music, radio stations and programsprograms
1: please show a quote where Paul refers to the NAU as a "secret conspiracy". Are you so naive as to believe that business giants have not considered the benefits of a North American Union? Of course they have, you moron.
2: Our "empire". There is so much info to support that we are spending more than a Trillion dollars overseas. When was the last time that our government stuck to the budget? We spend billions on projects that Americans never get to know about. I want you to go listen to everything Paul has ever said. He has said "we spend a trillion dollars overseas" but when talking about cutting he has always said "we could save hundred of billions of dollars". You took Paul out of context and put words in his mouth. You should be so ashamed. I wish you had the nerve to try and spout your uneducated, false propaganda to my face, you piece of sh!t.
3: Reagan. Reagan talked the talk .. he did not walk the walk. Reagan said some kind words about Ron Paul. Where is the fault in quoting him? It in no way affirms that Paul re-endorses Reagan. He has, on several occasions, during this campaign sited his disappointment with Reagan never changing the size and scope of government. Reagan???s words were an inspiration to many .. Paul wants to bring to light that his actions did not match.
Ron Paul's views on the issues here mentioned have been distorted or taken out of context. He has answered many of these attacks during interviews and debates; therefore, the writer should refer to his answers before writing such attacks toward him.
Ron Paul has never referred to the NAFTA superhighway as a secret conspiracy (he was asked about this highway during a CNN YouTube debate [it would have done a lot of good for the writer to listen to his response]). NAFTA is no conspiracy - nor is it a secret. It's fact. You may want to write off Glenn Beck and many others as quacks and odd balls for also researching NAFTA and coming to find the same factual information. The NAU is also real - and it is recorded fact that Mr. Bush and Mr. Clinton have signed deals toward a North American Union. All it takes is research to easily find this information from credible and reliable sources. The former president of Mexico was interviewed recently on Larry King Live and made mention of the NAU. There's no secret... there's just people like the writer here who try (for some reason) to convince people against the truth. I find such journalism to be quite odd and quite interesting.
RP on NAU
A youtube video on 'Mid-contentinental trade corridor'
No comments:
Post a Comment